Response to Katrina Email (see previous Blog Entry)
The response to the "Can Documentary Photography Make a Dent" email has been very interesting. It has opened up a dialogue within our community and we are encouraged to see this.
The main intent of that editorial piece is this:
Pictures are a vital part of telling a news story. We expect photos to show us what's really going on. When actual news photos are getting suppressed or photographers are being threated while doing their job, we are not provided with access to the truth.
Of course FiftyCrows did not generate or re-touch the photos;
Of course FiftyCrows did not approve of the fake images;
The re-touched photos were used as an example of how a very chaotic situation was made even more confusing by the use of imagery that did NOT show an actual news event. Our ability to discriminate between REAL and FICTION is constantly being challenged in today's fast-paced world. It was amazing, though not entirely surprising, to learn that some people did not comprehend that the photos were retouched—even asking how it was possible that the Bushes could be catching fish in the floodwater?!
FiftyCrows can only continue to be a source of honest and provocative photography as long as photographers are allowed to do what they do: take pictures. When fake images are being passed around the internet while at the same time we hear reports of serious photographer's cameras being destroyed, we need to speak out.
It's a very disturbing pattern that will require education and vigilance on the part of those of us who want to "make a dent." If we don't act, it's just another tacit agreement that the truth will not be neccesary, thank you.
For more provocative coverage of these events please click on the following important stories:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2005/09/hurricane2.html
http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0509/ethics.html
more ACTUAL photo coverage;
http://www.digitaljournalist.org
If you'd like to continue the dialogue, please click on the comment link below.
The main intent of that editorial piece is this:
Pictures are a vital part of telling a news story. We expect photos to show us what's really going on. When actual news photos are getting suppressed or photographers are being threated while doing their job, we are not provided with access to the truth.
Of course FiftyCrows did not generate or re-touch the photos;
Of course FiftyCrows did not approve of the fake images;
The re-touched photos were used as an example of how a very chaotic situation was made even more confusing by the use of imagery that did NOT show an actual news event. Our ability to discriminate between REAL and FICTION is constantly being challenged in today's fast-paced world. It was amazing, though not entirely surprising, to learn that some people did not comprehend that the photos were retouched—even asking how it was possible that the Bushes could be catching fish in the floodwater?!
FiftyCrows can only continue to be a source of honest and provocative photography as long as photographers are allowed to do what they do: take pictures. When fake images are being passed around the internet while at the same time we hear reports of serious photographer's cameras being destroyed, we need to speak out.
It's a very disturbing pattern that will require education and vigilance on the part of those of us who want to "make a dent." If we don't act, it's just another tacit agreement that the truth will not be neccesary, thank you.
For more provocative coverage of these events please click on the following important stories:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2005/09/hurricane2.html
http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0509/ethics.html
more ACTUAL photo coverage;
http://www.digitaljournalist.org
If you'd like to continue the dialogue, please click on the comment link below.

